Evaluation of Written Research Projects
Score Point 5
The essay shows excellent knowledge and understanding. The essay:
Score Point 5
The essay shows excellent knowledge and understanding. The essay:
- states a specific position clearly, using a thesis that guides development
- demonstrates a thoughtful and well-reasoned analysis to reach logical conclusions
- supports conclusions with appropriate and accurate historical information, minor errors, if any, do not compromise position
- sufficiently covers all areas of the topic
- conveys knowledge and ideas clearly and effectively
Score Point 4
The essay shows very good knowledge and understanding. The essay:
- states a clear position with a thesis that sets direction
- demonstrates thoughtful analysis to reach reasonable conclusions
- supports conclusions with accurate historical information with few errors; mistakes do not significantly compromise position
- covers all areas of the topic. but may give more attention to one area than another
- conveys knowledge and ideas clearly
Score Point 3
The essay shows adequate knowledge and understanding. The essay:
- states a general position with a simple or partially developed thesis
- organizes and uses information to support reasonable conclusions
- supports conclusions with generally accurate historical information; may contain factual errors, but is balanced by accurate historical information
- attempts to cover all aspects of the topic; may not complete all tasks
- conveys knowledge and ideas adequately
Score Point 2
The essay shows limited knowledge and understanding. The essay:
- lacks a clear position or establishes a flawed position partially related to the topic
- offers a reasonable conclusion without documentation or an analysis that contains misconceptions and/or fallacious reasoning
- lack accuracy, confines information to limited areas or use it inappropriately; may have numerous and major errors
- may cover only portions of the topic
- conveys knowledge and ideas in a manner that lacks clarity
Score Point I
The essay shows little or no knowledge and understanding. The essay:
- states no position or establishes a position not related to the topic
- usually lacks analysis
- merely mentions several names or events; may have an extremely high error rate
- does little more than mention the topic or repeat portions of the topic; refers to subject, but does not address topic
- conveys knowledge and ideas in an incomprehensible or extremely general manner
|
CATEGORY | 4 Excellent | 3 Good | 2 Fair | 1 Weak |
Prepared for report | Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. | Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. | The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. | Student does not seem at all prepared to present. |
Presented material in an interesting way | Shows a full understanding of the topic. | Shows a good understanding of the topic. | Shows a good understanding of parts of the topic. | Does not seem to understand the topic very well. |
Stays focused on topic | Stays on topic all (100%) of the time. | Stays on topic most (99-90%) of the time. | Stays on topic some (89%-75%) of the time. | It was hard to tell what the topic was. |
Used visual aids effectively | Student uses several props (could include costume) that show considerable work/creativity and which make the presentation better. | Student uses 1 prop that shows considerable work/creativity and which make the presentation better. | Student uses 1 prop which makes the presentation better. | The student uses no props OR the props chosen detract from the presentation. |
Made eye contact with audience | Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation. | Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation. | Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact. | Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation. |
Did not read presentation | Always (99-100% of time) speaks in complete sentences. | Mostly (80-98%) speaks in complete sentences. | Sometimes (70-80%) speaks in complete sentences. | Rarely speaks in complete sentences. |
Speaks Clearly | Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words. | Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word. | Speaks clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word. | Often mumbles or cannot be understood OR mispronounces more than one word. |
Listens to Other Presentations | Listens intently. Does not make distracting noises or movements. | Listens intently but has one distracting noise or movement. | Sometimes does not appear to be listening but is not distracting. | Sometimes does not appear to be listening and has distracting noises or movements. |
Evaluates Peers | Fills out peer evaluation completely and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend). | Fills out almost all of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend). | Fills out most of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend). | Fills out most of the peer evaluation but scoring appears to be biased. |
Managed time well | Presentation is 5-6 minutes long. | Presentation is 4 minutes long. | Presentation is 3 minutes long. | Presentation is less than 3 minutes OR more than 6 minutes. |
|
CATEGORY | 4 Excellent | 3 Accomplished | 2 Developing | 1 Beginning |
Research and gather information | Collects a great deal of information that relates to topic. | Collects some basic information and most relates to topic. | Collects very little information and only some relates to topic. | Does not collect any information that relates to topic. |
Share information | Relays a great deal of information that relates to topic. | Relays some basic information that relates to topic. | Relays very little information and only some relates to topic. | Does not relay any information to teammates. |
Be Punctual | Hands in all assignments on time. | Hands in most assignments on time. | Hands in most assignments late. | Does not hand in any assignments. |
Fulfill Team Role's Duties | Performs all duties of the assigned team. | Performs nearly all duties of assigned team. | Performs few duties of assigned team. | Does not perform any duties of assigned team. |
Listen to Other Teammates | Listens and speaks a fair amount. | Listens but sometimes talks too much. | Usually doing most of the talking, rarely allows others to speak | Is always talking, never allows anyone else to speak. |
Cooperate with Teammates | Never argues with teammates. | Rarely argues with teammates. | Sometimes argues with teammates. | Usually always argues with teammates. |
Making Fair Decisions | Always helps team reach a fair decision. | Usually considers all views. | Often sides with friends instead of considering all views. | Usually wants to have things their way. |
|
CATEGORY | 4 Excellent | 3 Accomplished | 2 Competent | 1 Developing |
Listening Skills | Habitually uses listening process. | Uses and practices listening process regularly. | Recognizes and responds to others speaking. | Does not listen. |
Non-Verbal Communication (eye contact, gestures, etc.) | Able to recognize and use subtle non-verbal communication cues. | Draws accurate conclusions from body language and facial expressions. | Comprehends some information from non-verbal cues. | Does not comprehend any non-verbal cues. |
Co-operation | Always shows ability to wait with openness and awareness to give appropriate verbal/non-verbal responses. | Usually shows ability to wait to give appropriate verbal/non-verbal responses. | Sometimes shows ability to wait to give appropriate verbal/non/verbal responses. | Does not respond appropriately. |
Participation | Talk inspires others. Supports and leads others in discussion. | Shares freely and explains with details. Makes connections with what others say. | Rarely talks during the discussion or talk is unrelated. Offers few ideas to the discussion. | Does not participate. |
|
CATEGORY | 4 Excellent | 3 Accomplished | 2 Fair | 1 Weak |
Originality | Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. | Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. | Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. | Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. |
Content - Accuracy | All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. | Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate. | The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. | Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. |
Cooperation | Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively all of the time. | Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively most of the time. | Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively some of the time. | Group often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility. |
Sequencing of Information | Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card. | Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place. | Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place. | There is no clear plan for the organization of information. |
Effectiveness | Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide. | Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide. | Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide. | Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide. |
Graphics Sources | Graphics are hand-drawn. The illustrator(s) are given credit somewhere in the presentation. | A combination of hand-drawn and stock graphics are used. Sources are documented in the presentation for all images. | Some graphics are from sources that clearly state that non-commercial use is allowed without written permission. Sources are documented in the presentation for all "borrowed" images. | Some graphics are borrowed from sites that do not have copyright statements or do not state that non-commercial use is allowed, OR sources are not documented for all images. |
Text - Font Choice & Formatting | Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. | Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. | Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. | Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. |